I Want Attention!

fd-17-internet
The newest issue of WIRED Magazine caught my attention. I had never read their publication, but the headline about pain piqued my curiosity. I noted the key words on the cover so I could find the article and read it later.
It was an interesting piece, but afterward I found other articles on their site worth reading. I felt tempted to email the site to myself and bookmark it. That’s what I do when I find a site that has good content.
 
And there lies my (our) problem: over consumption.
 
It’s my inattentiveness or curiosity but I read a lot of articles on various websites. My bookmarks tab has food sites, music sites and lots of articles. Sometimes I tend to stay on one site and read whatever looks appealing. After doing that time has flown by!
 
But spending my time on the internet like this is not good for my stress level. I say stress because I look at my bookmarks and start to feel anxious. It’s a lot of information saved for later.
 
But here’s the real problem: So many publications are covering the same topics. So the questions become, which site do we go to for news? Which publication is best for business? Every website is competing for your attention, but how do they get you to ONLY go to their site and trust them? Do you choose the all-inclusive site like The New York Times, or a specialty one to read about science? And if you do the latter, what makes you choose Scientific American over NPR? Or do you read both?
 
How do we choose where to focus our reading on topics that interest us? What makes a website good enough for us to keep going back to it? I wrestle with the answers to these questions whenever I catch myself spending a few minutes too long on a website.
 
The internet can be a great learning tool, no doubt. (And a distraction!) Google can find anything you’re looking for in a second. But whose information do you trust?
This reminds me, I should clean up my bookmarks.

Career Wednesday: To Apply or Not to Apply

Resume

I was shown a job for a corporate communications writer and while there was a lot of responsibility I thought that I could handle it, until I read that the company required a “minimum of 7 years of communications and/or public relations experience…”

My eyes widened.

MINIMUM 7 years of experience!!!

With a sigh I knew right then that the job was out of my reach and searched more.

I found an open position for an email marketing specialist and while I have experience in marketing (social media), I’m not too well versed in the skills the company is looking for. I know the gist of them but haven’t worked with the software closely. As I was working on my resume I was having second thoughts about applying.

I thought that there had to be people who applied to jobs that were a little beyond their reach and at least secured an interview. To help guide me I Googled and found an article by Forbes which stated that while it’ll be a waste to apply to a position that required seven years experience but you only have two, apply to jobs where it’ll be easy to fill in any gaps you’re concerned about (specific skills, for example).

That made me feel slightly better, knowing that the skills and knowledge the position asked for could be learned beforehand.

Then, I found this comforting article from The Muse (which was where the Forbes article came from, but with different content), and Fear #2 spoke to me. The quotes in that section made me relax and I realized that everyone is not going to meet every single requirement that’s listed on a job ad. There’s no way.

So, with those articles and a new perspective, I decided to apply to the position. I didn’t submit anything yet but will soon.

Have you applied to a job that was out of your reach and either landed an interview or the position? If so, how did you make yourself look like a strong candidate? Let me know in the comments!

Career Wednesday: What to do on a Slow Day at Work

6c8d6c6ba90204250ffddeaaaa5f3618

For the past two weeks it’s been slow in my department. If there was any work to be done it was completed in small increments, like half an hour. What my coworkers and I did to pass the time was talk to one another. (That wasn’t, and still isn’t, a bad thing.)

I realized that you can only talk to someone for so long before you run out of things to talk about, so I followed a coworkers lead and brought a book to read during long stretches of doing nothing. I figured that slow days were going to be perfect for catching up on reading, and thankfully I’m right. Once there’s a lull in the day I’m reading my book.

I also Googled ‘things to do on a slow day at work’ and came upon quite a few articles with suggestions, like this one. I like all of the tips, especially the learning one because I’m a big fan of education and just learning stuff for the sake of learning is great.

What do you do during a slow day at work? Let me know in the comments!